<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<?rfc toc="yes"?>
<?rfc symrefs="yes" ?>
<?rfc sortrefs="yes" ?>
<?rfc compact="yes" ?>
<?rfc subcompact="no" ?>

<rfc category="std" ipr="trust200902" docName="draft-ietf-bfd-unaffiliated-echo-13" updates="5880" consensus="true" submissionType="IETF">

<front>
    <title abbrev="Unaffiliated BFD Echo"> Unaffiliated Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) Echo </title>

    <author fullname="Weiqiang Cheng" initials="W" surname="Cheng">
    <organization>China Mobile</organization>
    <address>
        <postal>
        <street></street>
        <!-- Reorder these if your country does things differently -->
        <city>Beijing</city>
        <region></region>
        <code></code>
        <country>China</country>
        </postal>
        <phone></phone>
        <email>chengweiqiang@chinamobile.com</email>
        <!-- uri and facsimile elements may also be added -->
    </address>
    </author>


    <author fullname="Ruixue Wang" initials="R" surname="Wang">
    <organization>China Mobile</organization>
    <address>
        <postal>
        <street></street>
        <!-- Reorder these if your country does things differently -->
        <city>Beijing</city>
        <region></region>
        <code></code>
        <country>China</country>
        </postal>
        <phone></phone>
        <email>wangruixue@chinamobile.com</email>
        <!-- uri and facsimile elements may also be added -->
    </address>
    </author>
	
    <author fullname="Xiao Min" initials="X" surname="Min" role="editor">
    <organization>ZTE Corp.</organization>
    <address>
        <postal>
        <street></street>
        <!-- Reorder these if your country does things differently -->
        <city>Nanjing</city>
        <region></region>
        <code></code>
        <country>China</country>
        </postal>
       <phone></phone>
        <email>xiao.min2@zte.com.cn</email>
        <!-- uri and facsimile elements may also be added -->
    </address>
    </author>

    <author fullname="Reshad Rahman" initials="R" surname="Rahman">
    <organization>Equinix</organization>
    <address>
        <postal>
        <street></street>
        <!-- Reorder these if your country does things differently -->
        <city>Ottawa</city>
        <region></region>
        <code></code>
        <country>Canada</country>
        </postal>
        <phone></phone>
        <email>reshad@yahoo.com</email>
        <!-- uri and facsimile elements may also be added -->
    </address>
    </author>
	
    <author fullname="Raj Chetan Boddireddy" initials="R" surname="Boddireddy">
    <organization>Juniper Networks</organization>
    <address>
        <postal>
        <street></street>
        <!-- Reorder these if your country does things differently -->
        <city></city>
        <region></region>
        <code></code>
        <country></country>
        </postal>
        <phone></phone>
        <email>rchetan@juniper.net</email>
        <!-- uri and facsimile elements may also be added -->
    </address>
    </author>
	
    <date year="2024"/>
  
    <area>Routing</area>
    <workgroup>BFD Working Group</workgroup>

    <keyword>Request for Comments</keyword>
    <keyword>RFC</keyword>
    <keyword>Internet Draft</keyword>
    <keyword>I-D</keyword>

    <abstract>
	
    <t> 
	This document specifies an extension to the Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) 
	protocol that enables the use of the BFD Echo function without the need for an associated 
	BFD control session. This "Unaffiliated BFD Echo" mechanism allows rapid detection of 
	forwarding path failures in networks where establishing BFD control sessions is impractical 
	or undesirable. By decoupling the Echo function from the control plane, network devices can 
	utilize BFD's fast failure detection capabilities in a simplified manner, enhancing network 
	resiliency and operational efficiency.
	</t>
    <t> 
	This document updates RFC 5880 by defining a new Unaffiliated BFD Echo mechanism.
	</t>
	
    </abstract>
    
</front>
  
<middle>

    <section title="Introduction">

    <t>
	To minimize the impact of device and link faults on services and to improve network availability 
	in single-hop scenarios, a network device needs the capability to quickly detect communication 
	faults with adjacent devices. Prompt detection allows for timely remedial actions to ensure 
	service continuity.
	</t>

    <t> 
	BFD <xref target="RFC5880"/> provides a low-overhead, short-interval method for detecting faults 
	on the communication path between adjacent forwarding engines, which may include interfaces, data 
	links, and the forwarding engines themselves. BFD offers a unified mechanism to monitor any media 
	and protocol layers in real time.
	</t>

    <t> 
	BFD defines two primary modes-Asynchronous mode and Demand mode-to accommodate various deployment 
	scenarios. Additionally, it supports an Echo function that reduces the level of BFD support required 
	in device implementations, as described in Section 3.2 of <xref target="RFC5880"/>. When the Echo 
	function is activated, the local system sends BFD Echo packets, and the remote system loops back the 
	received Echo packets through the forwarding path, as described in Section 5 of <xref target="RFC5880"/> 
	and Section 4 of <xref target="RFC5881"/>. If several consecutive BFD Echo packets are not received 
	by the local system, the BFD session is declared Down.
	</t>
	
    <t> 
	There are two typical scenarios when using the BFD Echo function:
	<list style="symbols">
    <t> 
	Full BFD protocol capability with adjunct Echo function (Affiliated BFD Echo): This scenario requires 
	both the local device and the adjacent device to support the full BFD protocol. This operation remains 
	unchanged from <xref target="RFC5880"/>.
	</t>
    <t>
	BFD Echo-Only method without full BFD protocol capability (Unaffiliated BFD Echo): This scenario requires 
	only the local device to support sending and demultiplexing BFD Control packets. In this case, BFD 
	Control packets are sent over the BFD Echo port, and the processing procedures for Asynchronous mode 
	are used with the modifications specified in this document. Note that this method monitors the connectivity 
	to a system over a specific interface and does not verify the availability of a specific IP address on that 
	system.
	</t>
    </list>
	This document specifies the Unaffiliated BFD Echo scenario.
	</t>
	
    <t> 
	Section 5 of <xref target="RFC5880"/> indicates that the payload of an Affiliated BFD Echo packet is a local 
	matter and, therefore, its contents are outside the scope of that specification. This document, however, 
	specifies the contents of the Unaffiliated BFD Echo packet and the procedures for handling them. While this 
	may appear to contravene Section 5 of <xref target="RFC5880"/>, the core behavior in that RFC states that the 
	contents of BFD Echo packets are a local matter; this document is defining that "local matter". Regarding the 
	selection of IP addresses, the rules stated in Section 4 of <xref target="RFC5881"/> are applicable to the 
	encapsulation of an Unaffiliated BFD Echo packet.
	</t>
	
    <t> 
	Section 6.2.2 of <xref target="BBF-TR-146"/> describes a use case for the Unaffiliated BFD Echo.
	</t>
	
    <t> 
	This document updates <xref target="RFC5880"/> by defining a new method of BFD Echo-only operation which only 
	impacts the BFD Echo packets sender without requiring an implementation to support the BFD protocol at the 
	loop-back device, such that any IP forwarder can loop-back the BFD Echo packets. It specifies the use of the 
	Unaffiliated BFD Echo over IPv4 and IPv6 for a single IP hop. The reason why it cannot be used for multihop 
	paths is that the Unaffiliated BFD Echo packets would be looped back by the first hop. A full description of 
	the updates to <xref target="RFC5880"/> is provided in Section 3.
	</t>

    <section title="Conventions Used in This Document">
	
	<t> The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", 
	"RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and   "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted 
	as described in BCP 14 <xref target="RFC2119"/> <xref target="RFC8174"/> when, and only when, they 
	appear in all capitals, as shown here.</t>
	
	</section>
	
	</section>
	
    <section title="Unaffiliated BFD Echo Procedures">
	
    <t> 
	This section specifies the Unaffiliated BFD Echo procedures.
	</t>
	
    <figure anchor="Figure_1" title="Unaffiliated BFD Echo diagram">
    <artset>
    <artwork type="svg">
      <svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" version="1.1" height="272" width="512" viewBox="0 0 512 272" class="diagram" text-anchor="middle" font-family="monospace" font-size="13px" stroke-linecap="round">
      <path d="M 8,32 L 8,240" fill="none" stroke="black"/>
      <path d="M 40,64 L 40,192" fill="none" stroke="black"/>
      <path d="M 144,32 L 144,88" fill="none" stroke="black"/>
      <path d="M 144,104 L 144,136" fill="none" stroke="black"/>
      <path d="M 144,184 L 144,240" fill="none" stroke="black"/>
      <path d="M 368,32 L 368,136" fill="none" stroke="black"/>
      <path d="M 368,184 L 368,240" fill="none" stroke="black"/>
      <path d="M 384,144 L 384,176" fill="none" stroke="black"/>
      <path d="M 504,32 L 504,240" fill="none" stroke="black"/>
      <path d="M 8,32 L 144,32" fill="none" stroke="black"/>
      <path d="M 368,32 L 504,32" fill="none" stroke="black"/>
      <path d="M 48,64 L 136,64" fill="none" stroke="black"/>
      <path d="M 136,96 L 160,96" fill="none" stroke="black"/>
      <path d="M 136,144 L 376,144" fill="none" stroke="black"/>
      <path d="M 128,176 L 376,176" fill="none" stroke="black"/>
      <path d="M 48,192 L 136,192" fill="none" stroke="black"/>
      <path d="M 8,240 L 144,240" fill="none" stroke="black"/>
      <path d="M 368,240 L 504,240" fill="none" stroke="black"/>
      <polygon class="arrowhead" points="168,96 156,90.4 156,101.6" fill="black" transform="rotate(0,160,96)"/>
      <polygon class="arrowhead" points="136,176 124,170.4 124,181.6" fill="black" transform="rotate(180,128,176)"/>
      <g class="text">
      <text x="76" y="20">Device A</text>
      <text x="436" y="20">Device B</text>
      <text x="92" y="84">Unaffiliated</text>
      <text x="84" y="100">BFD Echo</text>
      <text x="80" y="116">Session</text>
      <text x="256" y="132">Unaffiliated BFD Echo</text>
      <text x="408" y="148">BFD</text>
      <text x="144" y="164">|</text>
      <text x="424" y="164">packets</text>
      <text x="420" y="180">looped</text>
      <text x="72" y="260">BFD supported</text>
      <text x="440" y="260">BFD not supported</text>
      </g>
      </svg>
    </artwork>
    <artwork type="ascii-art" align="left"><![CDATA[
        Device A                                     Device B
   +----------------+                           +----------------+
   |                |                           |                |
   |   |------------|                           |                |
   |   |Unaffiliated|                           |                |
   |   | BFD Echo  --->                         |                |
   |   | Session    |                           |                |
   |   |            |   Unaffiliated BFD Echo   |                |
   |   |           -------------------------------| BFD          |
   |   |            |                             | packets      |
   |   |          <-------------------------------| looped       |
   |   |------------|                           |                |
   |                |                           |                |
   |                |                           |                |
   +----------------+                           +----------------+
     BFD supported                               BFD not supported
     ]]></artwork>
    </artset>
    </figure>
			
    <t>
    As shown in Figure 1, device A supports BFD, whereas device B is a regular IP forwarder that does not support 
	BFD. Device A would send Unaffiliated BFD Echo packets, and after receiving the Unaffiliated BFD Echo packets 
	sent from device A, the one-hop-away BFD peer device B immediately loops them back by normal IP forwarding, this 
	allows device A to rapidly detect a connectivity loss to device B. Note that device B would not intercept any 
	received Unaffiliated BFD Echo packet or parse any BFD protocol field within the Unaffiliated BFD Echo packet.
	</t>
    <t>
    An Unaffiliated BFD Echo session is not actually a BFD session because there is no coordination of BFD protocol 
	state between the two link ends: the remote end does not support BFD and so cannot engage in a BFD session. The 
	local end as an initiator may regard the Unaffiliated BFD Echo session as a BFD session from its own standpoint.
	</t>
    <t>
	For the Unaffiliated Echo procedure, an Unaffiliated BFD Echo session is established on device A. The session 
	MUST adhere to the BFD state machine specified in Section 6.2 of <xref target="RFC5880"/>, with the exception 
	that the received state is not derived from BFD Control packets originating from the remote system, but rather 
	from packets that are generated by the local system and looped back from the remote system. Consequently, the 
	AdminDown state is not utilized in Unaffiliated BFD Echo.
	</t>
    <t>
	BFD Control packets are transmitted and received as Unaffiliated BFD Echo packets, using UDP destination port 
	3785, as defined in <xref target="RFC5881"/>. The standard procedures for BFD Asynchronous sessions are applied 
	to the looped BFD Control packets, including packet validation and authentication, in accordance with <xref target="RFC5880"/>.
	</t>
    <t>
	Once an Unaffiliated BFD Echo session is created on device A, it starts sending Unaffiliated BFD Echo packets. 
	Unaffiliated BFD Echo packets with zeroed "Your Discriminator" field are demultiplexed to the proper session based on 
	the source IP address or UDP source port, once the remote system loops back the local discriminator, all further 
	received packets are demultiplexed based on the "Your Discriminator" field only, which is conformed to the procedure 
	specified in Section 6.3 of <xref target="RFC5880"/>. An Unaffiliated BFD Echo packet follows the same encapsulation 
	rules as for a BFD Echo packet as specified in Section 4 of <xref target="RFC5881"/>. All Unaffiliated BFD Echo packets 
	for the session MUST be sent with a TTL or Hop Limit value of 255. Received packets MUST have a TTL or Hop Limit 
	value of 254 (similar to Appendix A of <xref target="RFC5082"/> to verify against a configured number of hops); otherwise, 
	the received packets MUST be dropped.
	</t>
    <t>
	In the context of an Unaffiliated BFD Echo packet, the "Desired Min TX Interval" and "Required Min RX Interval" fields, 
	as defined in <xref target="RFC5880"/>, MUST be populated with a specific value to prevent the potential exposure of 
	uninitialized memory. It is RECOMMENDED that these fields be set to a value of 1 second (1,000,000 microseconds). However, 
	upon receipt, these values MUST be ignored and MUST NOT be used in the calculation of the Detection Time.
	</t>
    <t>
	The "Required Min Echo RX Interval" field, as defined in <xref target="RFC5880"/>, MUST be populated with a specific value 
	to prevent the potential exposure of uninitialized memory. It is RECOMMENDED that this field be set to 0. However, this value 
	MUST be ignored upon receipt. The transmission interval for Unaffiliated BFD Echo packets when in the Up state MUST be 
	provisioned on device A.
	</t>
    <t>
	The functionality of the Unaffiliated BFD Echo feature is dependent on device B performing IP forwarding (specifically, IP 
	redirect functionality). While this capability is typically expected to be supported on routers, it may not be enabled by 
	default on hosts. The method for provisioning device B to loop back Unaffiliated BFD Echo packets is outside the scope of 
	this document.
	</t>
    <t>
	Similar to what's specified in <xref target="RFC5880"/>, the Unaffiliated BFD Echo session begins with the 
	periodic, slow transmission of Unaffiliated BFD Echo packets. The slow transmission rate should be no less than 
	one second per packet, until the session on device A is Up. After the session is Up, the provisioned transmission interval is 
	used. When the Unaffiliated BFD Echo session on device A goes Down, the slow transmission rate is resumed. The "Detect Mult" 
	defined in <xref target="RFC5880"/> MUST be set to a value provisioned on device A. When the bfd.SessionState is 
	Up and a "Detect Mult" number of Unaffiliated BFD Echo packets have not arrived at device A as they should, the device 
	A "MUST set bfd.SessionState to Down and bfd.LocalDiag to 2 (Echo Function Failed)", as specified in Section 6.8.5 
	of <xref target="RFC5880"/>.
	</t>
    <t>
	In summary, the Unaffiliated BFD Echo packet reuses the format of the BFD Control packet defined in <xref target="RFC5880"/>, 
	and the fields within the Unaffiliated BFD Echo packet are populated as follows:
	    <list style='symbols'>
	     <t>My Discriminator: MUST be set to the provisioned local discriminator.</t>
	     <t>Your Discriminator: MUST initially be set to 0, and then MUST be set to the value of "My Discriminator" looped back 
		 from the remote system.</t>
	     <t>Desired Min TX Interval: MUST be set to a specific value, with a suggested value of 1 second (1,000,000 microseconds).</t>
	     <t>Required Min RX Interval: MUST be set to a specific value, with a suggested value of 1 second (1,000,000 microseconds).</t>
	     <t>Required Min Echo RX Interval: MUST be set to a specific value, with a suggested value of 0.</t>
	     <t>Detect Mult: MUST be set to the provisioned maximum allowable number of consecutively lost Unaffiliated BFD Echo packets.</t>
	    </list>
	</t>

    </section>
	
    <section title="Updates to RFC 5880">
	
    <t> 
	The Unaffiliated BFD Echo described in this document reuses the BFD Echo function as described in <xref target="RFC5880"/> and 
	<xref target="RFC5881"/>, but does not require BFD Asynchronous or Demand mode. In the Unaffiliated BFD Echo operation, only the 
	local system has the BFD protocol enabled, while the remote system simply loops back the received BFD Echo packets as ordinary 
	data packets, without engaging in the BFD protocol.
	</t>
	
    <t> 
	This document updates <xref target="RFC5880"/> with respect to its descriptions on the BFD Echo 
	function as follows.
	</t>
	
    <t>
	The 4th paragraph of Section 3.2 of <xref target="RFC5880"/> is updated as below:
	</t>
	
	<t>
	<list>
	<t>
	OLD TEXT<br/>An adjunct to both modes is the Echo function.
	</t>
	<t>
	NEW TEXT<br/>An adjunct to both modes is the Echo function, which can also be running independently.
	</t>
	<t>
	OLD TEXT<br/>Since the Echo function is handling the task of detection, the rate of
    periodic transmission of Control packets may be reduced (in the case
    of Asynchronous mode) or eliminated completely (in the case of Demand mode).
	</t>
	<t>
	NEW TEXT<br/>Since the Echo function is handling the task of detection, the rate of
    periodic transmission of Control packets may be reduced (in the case
    of Asynchronous mode) or eliminated completely (in the case of Demand mode).
	The Echo function may also be used independently, with neither Asynchronous nor Demand mode.
	</t>
	</list>	
	</t>
	
    <t>
	The 3rd and 9th paragraphs of Section 6.1 of <xref target="RFC5880"/> are updated as below:
	</t>
	
    <t>
	<list>
	<t>
	OLD TEXT<br/>Once the BFD session is Up, a system can choose to start the Echo
    function if it desires and the other system signals that it will
    allow it. The rate of transmission of Control packets is typically 
	kept low when the Echo function is active.
	</t>
	<t>
	NEW TEXT<br/>When a system is running with Asynchronous or Demand mode, 
	once the BFD session is Up, it can choose to start the Echo
    function if it desires and the other system signals that it will
    allow it. The rate of transmission of Control packets is typically 
	kept low for Asynchronous mode or eliminated completely for Demand mode 
	when the Echo function is active.
	</t>
	<t>
	OLD TEXT<br/>If the session goes Down, the transmission of Echo packets (if any)
    ceases, and the transmission of Control packets goes back to the slow
    rate.
	</t>
	<t>
	NEW TEXT<br/>In Asynchronous mode or Demand mode, if the session goes Down, the transmission 
	of Echo packets (if any) ceases, and the transmission of Control packets goes back to the slow rate.
	</t>
	</list>
	</t>

    <t>
	The 2nd paragraph of Section 6.4 of <xref target="RFC5880"/> is updated as below:
	</t>
	
    <t>
	<list>
	<t>
	OLD TEXT<br/>When a system is using the Echo function, it is advantageous to
    choose a sedate reception rate for Control packets, since liveness
    detection is being handled by the Echo packets. This can be controlled 
	by manipulating the Required Min RX Interval field (see section 6.8.3).
	</t>
	<t>
	NEW TEXT<br/>When a system is using the Echo function with Asynchronous mode, it is advantageous to
    choose a sedate reception rate for Control packets, since liveness
    detection is being handled by the Echo packets. This can be controlled 
	by manipulating the Required Min RX Interval field (see section 6.8.3).
	Note that a system operating in Demand mode would direct the remote system to cease 
	the periodic transmission of BFD Control packets, by setting the Demand (D) bit in its 
	BFD Control packets.
	</t>
	</list>
	</t>

    <t>
	The 2nd paragraph of Section 6.8 of <xref target="RFC5880"/> is updated as below:
	</t>
	
    <t>
	<list>
	<t>
	OLD TEXT<br/>When a system is said to have "the Echo function active" it means
    that the system is sending BFD Echo packets, implying that the
    session is Up and the other system has signaled its willingness to
    loop back Echo packets.
	</t>
	<t>
	NEW TEXT<br/>When a system in Asynchronous or Demand mode is said to have "the Echo function active" it means
    that the system is sending BFD Echo packets, implying that the
    session is Up and the other system has signaled its willingness to
    loop back Echo packets.
	</t>
	</list>
	</t>

    <t>
	The 7th paragraph of Section 6.8.3 of <xref target="RFC5880"/> is updated as below:
	</t>
	
    <t>
	<list>
	<t>
	OLD TEXT<br/>When the Echo function is active, a system SHOULD set
    bfd.RequiredMinRxInterval to a value of not less than one second
    (1,000,000 microseconds). This is intended to keep received BFD 
	Control traffic at a negligible level, since the actual detection 
	function is being performed using BFD Echo packets.
	</t>
	<t>
	NEW TEXT<br/>When the Echo function is active with Asynchronous mode, a system SHOULD set
    bfd.RequiredMinRxInterval to a value of not less than one second
    (1,000,000 microseconds). This is intended to keep received BFD 
	Control traffic at a negligible level, since the actual detection 
	function is being performed using BFD Echo packets. While a system operating in 
	Demand mode would not receive BFD Control traffic.
	</t>
	</list>
	</t>

    <t>
	The 1st and 2nd paragraphs of Section 6.8.9 of <xref target="RFC5880"/> are updated as below:
	</t>
	
    <t>
	<list>
	<t>
	OLD TEXT<br/>BFD Echo packets MUST NOT be transmitted when bfd.SessionState is not
    Up.  BFD Echo packets MUST NOT be transmitted unless the last BFD
    Control packet received from the remote system contains a nonzero
    value in Required Min Echo RX Interval.
	</t>
	<t>
	NEW TEXT<br/>When a system is using the Echo function with either Asynchronous or Demand mode, 
	BFD Echo packets MUST NOT be transmitted when bfd.SessionState is not
    Up, and BFD Echo packets MUST NOT be transmitted unless the last BFD
    Control packet received from the remote system contains a nonzero
    value in Required Min Echo RX Interval.
	</t>
	<t>
	OLD TEXT<br/>BFD Echo packets MAY be transmitted when bfd.SessionState is Up.  The
    interval between transmitted BFD Echo packets MUST NOT be less than
    the value advertised by the remote system in Required Min Echo RX
    Interval...
	</t>
	<t>
	NEW TEXT<br/>When a system is using the Echo function with either Asynchronous or Demand mode, 
    BFD Echo packets MAY be transmitted when bfd.SessionState is Up, and the
    interval between transmitted BFD Echo packets MUST NOT be less than
    the value advertised by the remote system in Required Min Echo RX
    Interval...
	</t>
	</list>
	</t>

	</section>

    <section title="Operational Considerations">
	
    <t>
    All Operational Considerations from <xref target="RFC5880"/> apply, except that the Unaffiliated BFD Echo can only 
	be used across one hop, which result in unneccessity of a congestion control mechanism.
	</t>
    <t>
    Some devices that would benefit from the use of BFD may be unable to support the full BFD protocol. Examples of such 
	devices include servers running virtual machines, or Internet of Things (IoT) devices. By using Unaffiliated BFD 
	Echo, these devices only need to support a basic loopback function.
	</t>
    <t>
    As specified in Section 2 of this document, some configurations are needed to make the Unaffiliated BFD Echo work, 
	although the configurations won't go beyond the scope of <xref target="RFC5880"/>. At a BFD-enabled local system, the 
	Unaffiliated BFD Echo session can coexist with other type of BFD session, in which scenario the remote system for the 
	Unaffiliated BFD Echo session must be different from the remote system for other type of BFD session, and the local 
	system's discriminators for different BFD sessions must be different, at the same time it's not necessary for the local 
	system to differentiate the Unaffiliated BFD Echo session from other type of BFD session.
	</t>
	
    </section>
  	
    <section title="Security Considerations">
	
    <t>
	All Security Considerations from <xref target="RFC5880"/> and <xref target="RFC5881"/> apply.
	</t>
    <t>
	Unaffiliated BFD Echo requires the remote device to loop Unaffiliated BFD Echo packets. In order to provide this 
	service, the remote device cannot make use of Unicast Strict Reverse Path Forwarding (RPF) <xref target="RFC3704"/>, 
	otherwise the Unaffiliated BFD Echo packets might not pass the RPF check at the remote device.
	</t>
    <t>
	As specified in Section 5 of <xref target="RFC5880"/>, BFD Echo packets may be spoofed. Specifically for Unaffiliated 
	BFD Echo, a DoS attacker may send spoofed Unaffiliated BFD Echo packets to the loop-back device, so some form of 
	authentication SHOULD be included. Considering the Unaffiliated BFD Echo packets in this document are also BFD 
	Control packets, the "Authentication Section" as defined in <xref target="RFC5880"/> for BFD Control packet is 
	RECOMMENDED to be included within the Unaffiliated BFD Echo packet.
	</t>
	<t>
	As stated in Section 2, in order to avoid unset values being a potential vector for disclosure of uninitialized 
	memory, all fields of the Unaffiliated BFD Echo packet MUST be populated with a certain value, even if some of the 
	fields are ignored on receipt.
	</t>
	
    </section>
  
    <section title="IANA Considerations"> 
    <t> This document has no IANA action requested.</t>
    </section>
    
    <section title="Acknowledgements">
    <t> The authors would like to acknowledge Ketan Talaulikar, Greg Mirsky, Santosh Pallagatti, Aijun Wang, Eric Vyncke, 
	Adrian Farrel, Tim Wicinski, Dhruv Dhody, Stephen Farrell, Gunter Van de Velde, Gyan Mishra, Brian Trammell, Gorry Fairhurst, 
	Mahesh Jethanandani, John Scudder, Murray Kucherawy, and Zaheduzzaman Sarker for their careful review and very helpful comments.</t>
    <t> The authors would like to acknowledge Jeff Haas for his guidance, insightful review, and very helpful comments.</t>
    <t> The authors would like to acknowledge Erik Auerswald for his insightful comments during the discussion of this document.</t>
    <t> The authors would like to acknowledge Detao Zhao for the very helpful discussion.</t>
    </section>  
    
    <section title="Contributors">   
    <t>Liu Aihua<br/>ZTE<br/>Email: liu.aihua@zte.com.cn</t>    
    <t>Qian Xin<br/>ZTE<br/>Email: qian.xin2@zte.com.cn</t>    
    <t>Zhao Yanhua<br/>ZTE<br/>Email: zhao.yanhua3@zte.com.cn</t>
    </section> 
  
</middle>
  
<back>

    <references title="Normative References">
     <?rfc include="reference.RFC.2119"?>
     <?rfc include="reference.RFC.8174"?>
     <?rfc include="reference.RFC.5880"?>
     <?rfc include="reference.RFC.5881"?>
    </references>

	<references title="Informative References">
     <?rfc include="reference.RFC.3704"?>
     <?rfc include="reference.RFC.5082"?>
     <reference anchor="BBF-TR-146"
                 target="https://www.broadband-forum.org/technical/download/TR-146.pdf">
        <front>
          <title>BBF Technical Report - Subscriber Sessions Issue 1</title>

          <author>
            <organization>Broadband Forum</organization>
          </author>

          <date year="2013"/>
        </front>
     </reference>
    </references>

</back>
</rfc>

