<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>
<!DOCTYPE rfc SYSTEM "rfc2629.dtd">
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="rfc2629.xslt" ?>
<?rfc strict="yes" ?>
<?rfc toc="yes"?>
<?rfc tocdepth="4"?>
<?rfc symrefs="yes"?>
<?rfc sortrefs="yes" ?>
<?rfc compact="yes" ?>
<?rfc subcompact="no" ?>
<rfc category="std" docName="draft-hb-pim-light-01" ipr="trust200902">
  <front>
    <title abbrev="PIM Light">PIM Light</title>

    <author fullname="Hooman Bidgoli" initials="H" role="editor"
            surname="Bidgoli">
      <organization>Nokia</organization>

      <address>
        <postal>
          <street/>

          <city>Ottawa</city>

          <region/>

          <code/>

          <country>Canada</country>
        </postal>

        <phone/>

        <email>hooman.bidgoli@nokia.com</email>
      </address>
    </author>

    <author fullname="Stig" initials="S." surname="Venaas">
      <organization>Cisco System, Inc.</organization>

      <address>
        <postal>
          <street/>

          <city>San Jose</city>

          <region/>

          <code/>

          <country>US</country>
        </postal>

        <phone/>

        <email>stig@cisco.com</email>

        <uri/>
      </address>
    </author>

    <author fullname="Mankamana Mishra" initials="M." surname="Mishra">
      <organization>Cisco System</organization>

      <address>
        <postal>
          <street/>

          <city>Milpitas</city>

          <region/>

          <code/>

          <country>USA</country>
        </postal>

        <phone/>

        <facsimile/>

        <email>mankamis@cisco.com</email>

        <uri/>
      </address>
    </author>

    <author fullname="Zhaohui Zhang" initials="Z." surname="Zhang">
      <organization>Juniper Networks</organization>

      <address>
        <postal>
          <street/>

          <city>Boston</city>

          <region/>

          <code/>

          <country>USA</country>
        </postal>

        <phone/>

        <facsimile/>

        <email>zzhang@juniper.com</email>

        <uri/>
      </address>
    </author>

    <author fullname="Mike" initials="M." surname="McBride">
      <organization>Futurewei Technologies Inc.</organization>

      <address>
        <postal>
          <street/>

          <city>Santa Clara</city>

          <region/>

          <code/>

          <country>USA</country>
        </postal>

        <phone/>

        <facsimile/>

        <email>michael.mcbride@futurewei.com</email>

        <uri/>
      </address>
    </author>

    <date day="12" month="November" year="2021"/>

    <abstract>
      <t>This document specifies a new Protocol Independent Multicast
      interface which does not need PIM Hello to accept PIM Join/Prunes or PIM
      Asserts.</t>
    </abstract>
  </front>

  <middle>
    <section title="Introduction">
      <!-- 1 -->

      <t>It might be desirable to create a PIM interface between routers where
      only PIM Join/Prunes and Asserts packets are triggered over it without
      having a full PIM neighbor discovery. As an example, this type of PIM
      interface can be useful in some scenarios where the multicast state
      needs to be signaled over a network or medium which is not capable of or
      has no need for creating full PIM neighborship between its Peer Routers.
      These type of PIM interfaces are called PIM Light Interfaces (PLI).</t>
    </section>

    <section title="Conventions used in this document">
      <!-- 2 -->

      <t>The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
      "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
      "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14
      <xref target="RFC2119"/> <xref target="RFC8174"/> when, and only when,
      they appear in all capitals, as shown here.</t>

      <section title="Definitions">
        <!-- 2.1 -->

        <t>This draft uses definitions used in <xref target="RFC7761"/></t>
      </section>
    </section>

    <section title="PIM Light Interface">
      <!--  3 -->

      <t>RFC <xref target="RFC7761"/> section 4.3.1 describes the PIM neighbor
      discovery via Hello messages. It also describes that PIM Join/Prune or
      Assert messages are not accepted from a router unless a Hello message
      has been heard from that router.</t>

      <t>In some scenarios it is desired to build a multicast state between
      two directly attach or remote routers without establishing a PIM
      neighborship. There could be many reasons for this desired, but one
      example is the desired to signal multicast states upstream between two
      or more PIM Domains via a network or medium that is not optimized for or
      does not require PIM Neighbor establishment. An example is a BIER
      network connecting multiple PIM domains and PIM Join/prune messages are
      tunneled via bier as per <xref
      target="draft-ietf-bier-pim-signaling"/>.</t>

      <t>A PIM Light Interface (PLI) does accept Join/Prune and Assert
      messages from a unknown PIM router, without receiving a PIM Hello
      message form the router. Lack of Hello Messages on a PLI means there is
      no mechanism to learn about the neighboring PIM routers on each
      interface and there is no DR Priority options communicated between
      Routers either. As such the router doesn't create any General-Purpose
      state for neighboring PIM routers and it accepts and installs each Join
      message from upstream routers in its multicast routing table.</t>

      <t>Because of this a PLI needs to be created in very especial cases and
      the application that is using these PLIs should ensure there is no
      multicast duplication of packets. As an example, multiple upstream
      routers sending the same multicast stream to a single downstream
      router.</t>

      <t>As an example, in a BIER domain which is connecting 2 PIM networks. A
      PLI can be used to connect edge BIER routers and only multicast states
      communicated via PIM Join/prunes over the BIER domain. In this case to
      ensure there is no multicast stream duplication the PIM routers attached
      on each side of the BIER domain might want to establish PIM Adjacency
      via <xref target="RFC7761"/> to ensure DR selection on the edge of the
      BIER router while PLI is used in core of the BIER Domain.</t>

      <t/>

      <section title="PLI Configuration">
        <!-- 3.1 -->

        <t>Since a PLI doesn't require PIM Hello Messages and PIM neighbor
        adjacency is not checked for join/prune/assert messages, there needs
        to be a mechanism to enable PLI on interfaces for security purpose,
        while on some other interfaces this may be enabled automatically. An
        example of the latter is the logical interface for a BIER sub-domain
        <xref target="draft-ietf-bier-pim-signaling"/>.</t>
      </section>
    </section>

    <section title="IANA Considerations">
      <!-- 7 -->

      <t/>
    </section>

    <section title="Security Considerations">
      <!-- 8 -->

      <t/>
    </section>

    <section title="Acknowledgments">
      <!-- 9 -->

      <t/>
    </section>
  </middle>

  <back>
    <references title="Normative References">
      <!-- 10.1 -->

      <reference anchor="RFC2119">
        <front>
          <title>S. Brandner, "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
          Requirement Levels"</title>

          <author>
            <organization/>
          </author>

          <date month="March" year="1997"/>
        </front>
      </reference>

      <reference anchor="RFC8174">
        <front>
          <title>B. Leiba, "ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119
          Key Words"</title>

          <author>
            <organization/>
          </author>

          <date month="May" year="2017"/>
        </front>
      </reference>

      <reference anchor="RFC7761">
        <front>
          <title>B.Fenner, M.Handley, H. Holbrook, I. Kouvelas, R. Parekh,
          Z.Zhang "PIM Sparse Mode"</title>

          <author>
            <organization/>
          </author>

          <date month="March" year="2016"/>
        </front>
      </reference>

      <reference anchor="draft-ietf-bier-pim-signaling">
        <front>
          <title>H.Bidgoli, F.XU, J. Kotalwar, I. Wijnands, M.Mishra, Z.
          Zhang, "PIM Signaling Through BIER Core"</title>

          <author>
            <organization/>
          </author>

          <date month="July" year="2021"/>
        </front>
      </reference>
    </references>

    <references title="Informative References">
      <!-- 10.2 -->

      <reference anchor="RFC8279">
        <front>
          <title>Wijnands, IJ., Rosen, E., Dolganow, A., Przygienda, T. and S.
          Aldrin, "Multicast using Bit Index Explicit Replication"</title>

          <author>
            <organization/>
          </author>

          <date month="October" year="2016"/>
        </front>
      </reference>
    </references>
  </back>
</rfc>
<!-- generated from file C:\Users\hbidgoli\Downloads\draft-ietf-bier-pim-signaling-08.nroff with nroff2xml 0.1.0 by Tomek Mrugalski -->
