<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>
<?rfc strict="yes" ?>
<?rfc toc="yes"?>
<?rfc tocdepth="3"?>
<?rfc symrefs="yes"?>
<?rfc sortrefs="yes" ?>
<?rfc compact="yes" ?>
<?rfc subcompact="yes"?>
<!DOCTYPE rfc SYSTEM "rfc2629.dtd" [
<!ENTITY rfc2119 PUBLIC "" "http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.2119.xml">
<!ENTITY rfc3315 PUBLIC "" "http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.3315.xml">
<!ENTITY rfc2131 PUBLIC "" "http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.2131.xml">
<!ENTITY rfc2132 PUBLIC "" "http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.2132.xml">
<!ENTITY rfc4361 PUBLIC "" "http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.4361.xml">
<!ENTITY rfc5508 PUBLIC "" "http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.5508.xml">
<!ENTITY rfc5961 PUBLIC "" "http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.5961.xml">
<!ENTITY rfc6056 PUBLIC "" "http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.6056.xml">
<!ENTITY rfc6335 PUBLIC "" "http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.6335.xml">
<!ENTITY rfc6346 PUBLIC "" "http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.6346.xml">
<!ENTITY rfc6269 PUBLIC "" "http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.6269.xml">
<!ENTITY rfc3927 PUBLIC "" "http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.3927.xml">
<!ENTITY rfc7341 PUBLIC "" "http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.7341.xml">
]>
<rfc category="std" docName="draft-ietf-dhc-dynamic-shared-v4allocation-04"
     ipr="trust200902">
  <!-- ***** FRONT MATTER ***** -->

  <front>
    <title abbrev="Dynamic Shared IPv4 Allocation">Dynamic Allocation of
    Shared IPv4 Addresses</title>

    <author fullname="Yong Cui" initials="Y." surname="Cui">
      <organization>Tsinghua University</organization>

      <address>
        <postal>
          <street></street>

          <city>Beijing</city>

          <code>100084</code>

          <country>P.R. China</country>
        </postal>

        <phone>+86-10-6260-3059</phone>

        <email>yong@csnet1.cs.tsinghua.edu.cn</email>
      </address>
    </author>

    <author fullname="Qi Sun" initials="Q.S" surname="Sun">
      <organization>Tsinghua University</organization>

      <address>
        <postal>
          <street></street>

          <city>Beijing</city>

          <code>100084</code>

          <country>P.R. China</country>
        </postal>

        <phone>+86-10-6278-5822</phone>

        <email>sunqi@csnet1.cs.tsinghua.edu.cn</email>
      </address>
    </author>

    <author fullname="Ian Farrer" initials="I.F" surname="Farrer">
      <organization>Deutsche Telekom AG</organization>

      <address>
        <postal>
          <street>CTO-ATI, Landgrabenweg 151</street>

          <city>Bonn</city>

          <region>NRW</region>

          <code>53227</code>

          <country>Germany</country>
        </postal>

        <email>ian.farrer@telekom.de</email>
      </address>
    </author>

    <author fullname="Yiu L. Lee" initials="Y.L" surname="Lee">
      <organization>Comcast</organization>

      <address>
        <postal>
          <street>One Comcast Center</street>

          <city>Philadelphia</city>

          <code>PA 19103</code>

          <country>USA</country>
        </postal>

        <phone></phone>

        <email>yiu_lee@cable.comcast.com</email>
      </address>
    </author>

    <author fullname="Qiong Sun" initials="Q.S" surname="Sun">
      <organization>China Telecom</organization>

      <address>
        <postal>
          <street>Room 708, No.118, Xizhimennei Street</street>

          <city>Beijing</city>

          <code>100035</code>

          <country>P.R. China</country>
        </postal>

        <phone>+86-10-58552936</phone>

        <email>sunqiong@ctbri.com.cn</email>
      </address>
    </author>

    <author fullname="Mohamed Boucadair" initials="M.B" surname="Boucadair">
      <organization>France Telecom</organization>

      <address>
        <postal>
          <street>2330 Central Expressway</street>

          <city>Rennes</city>

          <code>35000</code>

          <country>France</country>
        </postal>

        <phone></phone>

        <email>mohamed.boucadair@orange.com</email>
      </address>
    </author>

    <date year="2015" />

    <area>Internet</area>

    <workgroup>DHC WG</workgroup>

    <abstract>
      <t>This memo describes the dynamic allocation of shared IPv4 addresses
      to clients using DHCPv4. Address sharing allows a single IPv4 address to
      be allocated to multiple active clients simultaneously, each client
      being differentiated by a unique set of transport layer source port
      numbers. The necessary changes to existing DHCPv4 client and server
      behavior are described and a new DHCPv4 option for provisioning clients
      with shared IPv4 addresses is included.</t>

      <t>Due to the nature of IP address sharing, some limitations to its
      applicability are necessary. This memo describes these limitations and
      recommends suitable architectures and technologies where address sharing
      may be utilized.</t>
    </abstract>
  </front>

  <!-- ***** MIDDLE MATTER ***** -->

  <middle>
    <section anchor="Introduction" title="Introduction">
      <t>The shortage of available public IPv4 addresses means that it is not
      always possible for operators to allocate a full IPv4 address to every
      connected device. This problem is particularly acute whilst an operator
      is migrating from their existing, native IPv4 network to a native IPv6
      network with IPv4 provided as an overlay service. During this phase,
      public IPv4 addresses are needed to provide for both existing and
      transition networks.</t>

      <t>Two main types of solutions have emerged to address the problem (see
      Appendix A of <xref target="RFC6269"></xref>):</t>

      <t><list style="numbers">
          <t>Deploying Carrier Grade Network Address Translation devices
          (CGNAT, <xref target="RFC6888"></xref>).</t>

          <t>Distributing the same public IPv4 address to multiple clients
          differentiated by non-overlapping layer 4 port sets.</t>
        </list></t>

      <t>This memo focuses on the second category of solutions.</t>

      <t><xref target="RFC7341"></xref> introduces a "DHCP 4o6 Server", which
      offers dynamic leasing for IPv4 addresses to clients as in DHCPv4 <xref
      target="RFC2131"></xref> but transported within a DHCPv6 message flow.
      This memo specifies a new DHCPv4 option: OPTION_V4_PORTPARAMS, and
      describes how it can be used for the dynamic leasing of shared IPv4
      addresses.</t>

      <t>Although DHCPv4 over DHCPv6 is used as the underlying DHCPv4
      transport mechanism throughout this document, OPTION_V4_PORTPARAMS as a
      DHCPv4 option may also be used in other solutions, if required.</t>

      <t>This extension is only suitable for specific architectures based on
      the Address plus Port model (A+P) <xref target="RFC6346"></xref> such as
      <xref target="I-D.ietf-softwire-lw4over6"></xref> and certain
      configurations of <xref target="I-D.ietf-softwire-map"></xref>.</t>
    </section>

    <section title="Requirements Language">
      <t>The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
      "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
      document are to be interpreted as described in <xref
      target="RFC2119"></xref>.</t>
    </section>

    <section title="Terminology">
      <t>This document makes use of the following terms: <list hangIndent="22"
          style="hanging">
          <t hangText="Shared IPv4 address:">An IPv4 address with a restricted
          layer 4 port set. Connections sourced from the shared address MUST
          use source ports within the assigned port set.</t>

          <t hangText="Port Set ID (PSID):">Identifier for a range of ports
          assigned to a DHCP client.</t>
        </list></t>
    </section>

    <section title="Functional Overview">
      <t>Functionally, the dynamic allocation of shared IPv4 addresses by the
      DHCP 4o6 Server is similar to dynamic allocation process for 'full' IPv4
      addresses described in <xref target="RFC2131"></xref>. The essential
      difference is that the DHCP 4o6 Server MAY allocate the same IPv4
      address to more than one DHCP 4o6 client simultaneously, providing that
      each shared address allocation also includes a range of layer 4 source
      ports unique to that address (i.e., the combined tuple of IPv4 address
      and Port Set ID MUST be unique for each active lease).</t>

      <t>The DHCP 4o6 client implements OPTION_V4_PORTPARAMS (described
      below), which is a DHCPv4 option containing PSID (Port Set ID)
      information. The client includes this option within the Parameter
      Request List option <xref target="RFC2132"></xref> in its DHCPv4
      DHCPDISCOVER and DHCPREQUEST messages, indicating its support for
      shared, dynamic address leasing to the DHCP 4o6 server.</t>

      <t>OPTION_V4_PORTPARAMS is also implemented by the server to identify
      clients that support shared, dynamic address leasing. With this option,
      the server can dynamically allocate PSIDs to clients and maintain shared
      IPv4 address leases. The server then manages unique client leases based
      the IPv4 address and PSID tuple, instead of using only the IPv4
      address.</t>

      <t>In the event that a dynamic, shared addressing capable client
      receives more than one DHCP 4o6 offer, where a received offer does not
      contain OPTION_V4_PORTPARAMS (i.e.,j is an offer for a full IPv4
      address), then the client SHOULD prefer the full IPv4 offer over the
      shared IPv4 address offer(s), unless specifically configured
      otherwise.</t>
    </section>

    <section title="Client-Server Interaction">
      <t>The following DHCPv4 message flow is transported within the
      DHCPv4-query and DHCPv4-response messages as in DHCPv4 over DHCPv6 <xref
      target="RFC7341"></xref>.</t>

      <t><list style="numbers">
          <t>When the client constructs the DHCPv4 DHCPDISCOVER message to be
          transported within the DHCPv4-query message, the DHCPDISCOVER
          message MUST include the client identifier option (constructed as
          per <xref target="RFC4361"></xref>) and the Parameter Request List
          (PRL) option with OPTION_V4_PORTPARAMS.</t>

          <t>DHCP 4o6 Servers that receive the DHCPDISCOVER message and
          support shared IPv4 addresses respond with a DHCPOFFER message as
          usual with the shared IPv4 address in the 'yiaddr' field and MUST
          add an OPTION_V4_PORTPARAMS option containing an available
          restricted port set. If the DHCPDISCOVER included an
          OPTION_V4_PORTPARAMS option containing a non-zero PSID-Len field,
          the DHCP 4o6 Server MAY allocate a port set of the requested size to
          the client (depending on policy). The DHCPOFFER message is then
          encapsulated in the DHCPv4-response message and sent to the
          client.</t>

          <t>The client evaluates all received DHCPOFFER messages and selects
          one (e.g., based on the configuration parameters received, such as
          the size of the offered port set). The client then sends a
          DHCPREQUEST encapsulated in the DHCPv4-query message containing the
          corresponding OPTION_V4_PORTPARAMS received in the DHCPOFFER
          message.</t>

          <t>The server identified in the DHCPREQUEST message creates a
          binding for the client. The binding includes the client identifier,
          the IPv4 address and the PSID. These parameters are used by both the
          server and the client to identify a lease in any DHCP message. The
          server MUST respond with a DHCPACK message containing
          OPTION_V4_PORTPARAMS for the requesting client.</t>

          <t>On receipt of the DHCPACK message with the configuration
          parameters, the client MUST NOT perform an in-use probe on the
          address, such as ARPing for a duplicate allocated address.</t>

          <t>If the client chooses to relinquish its lease by sending a
          DHCPRELEASE message, the client MUST include the leased network
          address and OPTION_V4_PORTPARAMS (with the allocated PSID) to
          identify the lease to be released.</t>
        </list></t>

      <t>In the case that the client has stored the previously allocated
      address and restricted port set, the logic described in Section 3.2 of
      <xref target="RFC2131"></xref> MUST be followed on the condition that
      the client's source IPv6 address for DHCP 4o6 does not change. Note,
      this corresponds to INIT-REBOOT state defiend in <xref
      target="RFC2131"></xref>. The client MUST include the
      OPTION_V4_PORTPARAMS with the requested port set information in the
      message flow, which starts with a DHCPREQUEST message. If the client's
      DHCP 4o6 IPv6 source address is changed for any reason, the client MUST
      re-initiate the DHCP 4o6 shared-address provisioning process by sending
      a DHCPDISCOVER message.</t>
    </section>

    <section title="Client Behavior">
      <t>A DHCP 4o6 client discovering for a shared IPv4 address MUST include
      the OPTION_V4_PORTPARAMS option code in the Parameter Request List
      option. If a client has been successfully allocated and IPv4 address and
      PSID previously, the client MAY include in the DHCPDISCOVER message the
      'requested IP address' option along with an OPTION_V4_PORTPARAMS to
      request that a specific IPv4 address and PSID be re-assigned.
      Alternatively, the client MAY omit the 'requested IP address' option,
      but include an OPTION_V4_PORTPARAMS with a non-zero value in only the
      PSID-Len field, as a hint to the server for the preferred size of the
      port set.</t>

      <t>A client that requests OPTION_V4_PORTPARAMS, but receives DHCPOFFER
      and DHCPACK messages without OPTION_V4_PORTPARAMS SHOULD proceed as
      defined in <xref target="RFC7341"></xref> and configure a full IPv4
      address with no address sharing.</t>

      <t>When receiving a DHCPACK message containing OPTION_V4_PORTPARAMS, the
      client MUST use the received explicit PSID for configuring the interface
      for which the DHCP 4o6 request was made.</t>

      <t>The client MUST NOT probe a newly received IPv4 address (e.g., using
      ARP) to see if it is in use by another host.</t>

      <t>When the client renews or releases its DHCP lease, it MUST put the
      values of offset, PSID length and PSID into OPTION_V4_PORTPARAMS, and
      send it to the server within corresponding DHCPv4 messages that are
      conveyed through DHCPv4-query message.</t>

      <t>In the event that the client's DHCP 4o6 IPv6 source address is
      changed for any reason, the client MUST re-initiate the DHCP 4o6
      shared-address provisioning process by sending a DHCPDISCOVER
      message.</t>

      <section title="Restrictions to Client Usage of a Shared IPv4 Address">
        <t>As a single IPv4 address is being shared between a number of
        different clients, the allocated shared address is only suitable for
        certain uses. The client MUST implement a function to ensure that only
        the allocated layer 4 ports of the shared IPv4 address are used for
        sourcing new connections, or accepting inbound connections.</t>

        <t>The client MUST apply the following rules for all traffic destined
        to or originating from the shared IPv4 address:</t>

        <t><list style="symbols">
            <t>The client MUST use only port-aware protocols (e.g., TCP, UDP,
            DCCP etc.) or ICMP implementing <xref
            target="RFC5508"></xref>.</t>

            <t>All connections originating from the shared IPv4 address MUST
            use a source port taken from the allocated restricted port
            set.</t>

            <t>The client MUST NOT accept inbound connections on ports outside
            of the allocated restricted port set.</t>
          </list></t>

        <t>In order to prevent addressing conflicts which could arise from the
        allocation of the same IPv4 address, the client MUST NOT configure the
        received restricted IPv4 address on-link.</t>

        <t>The mechanism by which a client implements the above rules is out
        of the scope of this document.</t>

        <t>In the event that the DHCPv4 over DHCPv6 configuration mechanism
        fails for any reason, the client MUST NOT configure an IPv4 link-local
        address <xref target="RFC3927"></xref> (taken from the 169.254.0.0/16
        range).</t>
      </section>
    </section>

    <section title="Server Behavior">
      <t>The DHCP 4o6 Server MUST NOT reply with OPTION_V4_PORTPARAMS unless
      the client has explicitly listed the option code in the Parameter
      Request List (Option 55) <xref target="RFC2132"></xref>.</t>

      <t>The DHCP 4o6 Server SHOULD reply with OPTION_V4_PORTPARAMS if the
      client includes OPTION_V4_PORTPARAMS in its Parameter Request List. In
      order to achieve the dynamic management of shared IPv4 addresses, the
      server MUST implement an address and port-set pool that provides the
      same function as the address pool in a regular DHCP server. The server
      MUST use the combination of address and PSID as the key for maintaining
      the state of a lease, and for searching for an available lease for
      assignment. The leasing database MUST include the IPv4 address, PSID and
      client identifier of the requesting client.</t>

      <t>When a server receives a DHCPDISCOVER message with
      OPTION_V4_PORTPARAMS in the Parameter Request List option, the server
      determines an IPv4 address with a PSID for the requesting client. If an
      IPv4 address with a PSID is available, the server SHOULD follow the
      logic below to select which specific address and PSID to provision to
      the client. The logic is similar to that in Section 4.3.1 of <xref
      target="RFC2131"></xref>.</t>

      <t><list style="symbols">
          <t>The client's current address with the PSID as recorded in the
          client's current lease binding, ELSE</t>

          <t>The client's previous address with PSID as recorded in the
          client's (expired or released) binding, if that address with PSID is
          in the server's pool of available addresses and PSIDs, and not
          already allocated, ELSE</t>

          <t>The address requested in the 'Requested IP Address' option along
          with the PSID parameters requested in the OPTION_V4_PORTPARAMS, if
          that pair of address and PSID is valid and not already allocated,
          ELSE</t>

          <t>A new address with a PSID allocated from the server's pool of
          available addresses and PSIDs.</t>
        </list></t>

      <t>Upon receipt of a DHCPRELEASE message with OPTION_V4_PORTPARAMS, the
      server searches for the lease using the address in the 'ciaddr' field
      and the PSID information in the OPTION_V4_PORTPARAMS, and marks the
      lease as unallocated.</t>

      <t>The port-set assignment MUST be coupled with the address assignment
      process. Therefore the server MUST assign the address and port set in
      the same DHCP message.</t>

      <t>When defining the pools of IPv4 addresses and PSIDs which are
      available to lease to clients, the server MUST implement a mechanism to
      reserve some port ranges (e.g., 'well-known-ports' 0-1023) from
      allocation to clients. The reservation policy SHOULD be
      configurable.</t>

      <section title="Leasing Shared and Non-Shared IPv4 Addresses from a Single DHCP 4o6 Server">
        <t>A single DHCP 4o6 server may serve clients that do not support
        OPTION_V4_PORTPARAMS as well as those that do. As the rules for the
        allocation of shared addresses differ from the rules for full IPv4
        address assignment, the DHCP 4o6 server MUST implement a mechanism to
        ensure that clients not supporting OPTION_V4_PORTPARAMS do not receive
        shared addresses. For example, two separate IPv4 addressing pools
        could be used, one of which allocates IPv4 addresses and PSIDs only to
        clients that have requested them.</t>

        <t>If the server is only configured with address pools for shared
        address allocation, it MUST discard requests that do not contain
        OPTION_V4_PORTPARAMS in the Parameter Request List option.</t>
      </section>
    </section>

    <section title="DHCPv4 Port Parameters Option">
      <t>The DHCPv4 Port Parameters Option uses the same fields as the S46
      Port Parameters Option described in Section 4.5 of <xref
      target="I-D.ietf-softwire-map-dhcp"></xref>, implemented as a DHCPv4
      option. This is to maintain compatibility with existing port set
      implementations.</t>

      <t>The format of OPTION_V4_PORTPARAMS is shown in <xref
      target="img-option-portparams"></xref>.</t>

      <figure align="center" anchor="img-option-portparams"
              title="DHCPv4 Port Parameters Option">
        <preamble></preamble>

        <artwork align="center"><![CDATA[
       0                             1
       0  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  0  1  2  3  4  5 
      +--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+
      |      option-code      |     option-len        |
      +--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+
      |         offset        |       PSID-len        |
      +--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+
      |                     PSID                      |
      +--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+      
      ]]></artwork>
      </figure>

      <t><list style="symbols">
          <t>option-code: OPTION_V4_PORTPARAMS (TBA)</t>

          <t>option-len: 4</t>

          <t>offset: (PSID offset) 8 bits long field that specifies the
          numeric value for the excluded port range/offset bits (A-bits), as
          per section 5.1 of <xref target="I-D.ietf-softwire-map"></xref>.
          Allowed values are between 0 and 15, with the default value being 6
          for MAP based implementations. This parameter is unused by a
          Lightweight 4over6 client and should be set to 0.</t>

          <t>PSID-len: Bit length value of the number of significant bits in
          the PSID field (also known as 'k'). When set to 0, the PSID field is
          to be ignored. After the first 'a' bits, there are k bits in the
          port number representing the value of PSID. Subsequently, the
          address sharing ratio would be 2^k.</t>

          <t>PSID: Explicit 16-bit (unsigned word) PSID value. The PSID value
          algorithmically identifies a set of ports assigned to a client. The
          first k-bits on the left of this 2-octets field is the PSID value.
          The remaining (16-k) bits on the right are padding zeros.</t>
        </list></t>

      <t><xref target="I-D.ietf-softwire-map"></xref> Section 5.1 provides a
      full description of how the PSID is interpreted by the client.</t>

      <t>In order to exclude the system ports (<xref target="RFC6335"></xref>)
      or ports reserved by ISPs, the former port-sets that contain well-known
      ports MUST NOT be assigned unless the operator has explicitly configured
      otherwise (e.g., by allocating a full IPv4 address).</t>
    </section>

    <section title="Security Considerations">
      <t>The security considerations in <xref target="RFC2131"></xref> and
      <xref target="RFC7341"></xref> are to be considered. Additional
      considerations are elaborated in the following sub-sections.</t>

      <section title="Denial-of-Service">
        <t>The solution is vulnerable to DoS attacks when used on a shared
        medium or when access network authentication is not a prerequisite to
        IP address assignment. The solution SHOULD only be used on
        point-to-point links, tunnels, and/or in environments where
        authentication at the link layer is performed before IP address
        assignment. It is not suitable for network access over shared
        mediums.</t>
      </section>

      <section title="Port Randomization">
        <t>Preserving port randomization <xref target="RFC6056"></xref> may be
        more or less difficult depending on the address sharing ratio (i.e.,
        the size of the port space assigned to a client). The host can only
        randomize the ports inside a fixed port range <xref
        target="RFC6269"></xref>.</t>

        <t>More discussion to improve the robustness of TCP against Blind
        In-Window Attacks can be found at <xref target="RFC5961"></xref>.
        Other means than the (IPv4) source port randomization to provide
        protection against attacks should be used (e.g., use <xref
        target="RFC5961"></xref> to improve the robustness of TCP against
        Blind In-Window Attacks, use IPv6).</t>

        <t>A proposal to preserve the entropy when selecting port is discussed
        in <xref target="I-D.bajko-pripaddrassign"></xref>.</t>
      </section>
    </section>

    <section anchor="IANA" title="IANA Considerations">
      <t>IANA is requested to assign the following new DHCPv4 Option Code in
      the registry maintained in http://www.iana.org/assignments/bootp-
      dhcp-parameters/:</t>

      <texttable style="headers">
        <ttcol align="right">Option Name</ttcol>

        <ttcol>Value</ttcol>

        <ttcol>Data length</ttcol>

        <ttcol>Meaning</ttcol>

        <c>OPTION_V4_PORTPARAMS</c>

        <c>TBA</c>

        <c>4</c>

        <c>This option is used to configure a set of ports bound to a shared
        IPv4 address.</c>
      </texttable>

      <t></t>
    </section>

    <section anchor="Acknowledgements" title="Acknowledgements">
      <t>This document is merged from <xref
      target="I-D.sun-dhc-port-set-option"></xref> and <xref
      target="I-D.farrer-dhc-shared-address-lease"></xref>.</t>

      <t>The authors would like to thank Peng Wu, Gabor Bajko, Teemu
      Savolainen, Ted Lemon, Tina Tsou, Pierre Levis, Cong Liu and Marcin
      Siodelski, for their contributions to this work.</t>
    </section>
  </middle>

  <!--  *****BACK MATTER ***** -->

  <back>
    <references title="Normative References">
      &rfc2119;

      &rfc2131;

      &rfc2132;

      &rfc4361;

      &rfc5961;

      &rfc6056;

      &rfc7341;

      <?rfc include="reference.I-D.ietf-softwire-lw4over6"?>

      <?rfc include='reference.I-D.ietf-softwire-map'?>
    </references>

    <references title="Informative References">
      &rfc3927;

      &rfc5508;

      &rfc6269;

      &rfc6335;

      &rfc6346;

      <?rfc include='reference.I-D.ietf-softwire-map-dhcp'?>

      <?rfc include='reference.RFC.6888'?>

      <?rfc include='reference.I-D.bajko-pripaddrassign'?>

      <?rfc include='reference.I-D.sun-dhc-port-set-option'?>

      <?rfc include='reference.I-D.farrer-dhc-shared-address-lease'?>
    </references>
  </back>
</rfc>
